Medical Malpractice Not the Cause of Insurance Rate Rises in New York

Christopher Nace
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 660
Visit Christopher Nace on LinkedInVisit Christopher Nace on Avvo
Posted by Christopher NaceJune 07, 2009 10:57 AM

We often hear that the reason doctors have to pay so much in medical malpractice insurance premiums is because of "runaway juries" and "soaring malpractice awards." But a recent study by the New York Public Interest Research Group has established that, in New York at least, nothing could be further from the truth. As recently noted in the New York Times:

The New York Public Interest Research Group reviewed 15 years of federal data on medical malpractice payments and concluded that the amount of money paid for malpractice claims in New York has actually fallen in recent years, and that the number of overall claims has remained “remarkably stable.”

The report went on to state that

“The claim being made by the medical lobby that this is a lawsuit crisis is just fear-mongering,” said Blair Horner, legislative director for the research group. “There obviously must be something else going on or the premiums wouldn’t keep going up. And someone’s got to figure out what that is.”

The report also found that contrary to reports, doctors were not fleeing New York State:

Further, the report’s findings also contradict another claim often made by hospital lobbyists and doctors’ advocates: that high malpractice premiums are driving doctors out of the state. In fact, the report states, the number of doctors practicing in New York has grown at a rate more than five times the rate of growth in the state’s population

Hospital and doctor lobbyists responded by stating that the report is wrong with regard to the number of doctors in New York. But, curiously, they did not address the question of the so-called medical malpractice crisis.

It's funny what happens when groups such as NYPIRG take the time to study the reality of an issue. Thanks to their work, we know that we need not

Tags: None

4 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Mike BryantInjury Board Attorney Member
Posted by Mike Bryant
June 07, 2009 7:36 PM

Very good point, it is interesting how each of these studies come out the same. It's important we point that out every time.

Robert Oshel
Posted by Robert Oshel
June 08, 2009 6:34 AM

Data from NPDB reports for research purposes is freely available for download at LINK Note that the data file does not include information which would identify the physician involved, but statistical information from each report is included. Anyone with statistical software can do their own analysis of malpractice payments by state, by year, by profession, etc.

Robert Oshel, Ph.D. (retired NPDB Associate Director for Research and Disputes)

Jim O'Hare VP med mal claims
Posted by Jim O'Hare VP med mal claims
June 08, 2009 10:35 AM

PRI the # 2 NY med mal writer has a negative 43 mil surplus. MLMIC has had their rating drop. $800 mill paid last year on NY claims. Your logic is the same as our improving economy- i.e.- since only 400,000 people lost their jobs last month, things are improving. Injured people should get paid, at least 90% of the indemnity. If 40% of the settlement monies goes to defense and contingency fees, wouldnt med mal be positivly influenced by getting most of the money to the injured parties? The correct answer is against your personal interests. -Consider arbitration, where Dr's get a jury of peers and the money goes to the injured. regards Jim Med mal claims analyst since 1985

Mike BryantInjury Board Attorney Member
Posted by Mike Bryant
June 09, 2009 12:14 AM

Edward Amsler, an MLMIC vice president, says his company is concerned about its dwindling reserves as well."We have a surplus of $300 million, but we'd be a lot more comfortable with $1 billion,"
LINK

Seems like you aren't presenting the whole story Mr O'Hare. Also nothing you have posted suggests that it's the Claims that are driving the issue. That was Chris' well written point.

Comments for this article are closed. You may still contact the author directly by email.

Subscribe to The Legal Examiner Washington

The Legal Examiner Washington RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

The Legal Examiner Washington is brought to you by Paulson & Nace

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Paulson & Nace (202) 463-1999 www.paulsonandnace.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Serving Washington, DC and all surrounding areas including Montgomery County, Maryland; Prince George's County, Maryland; Anne Arundel County, Maryland; Berkeley County, West Virginia; Jefferson County, West Virginia; and Northern Virginia.
1615 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, District of Columbia 20009-2520 [ Show Map ]
Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address